Rheumatoid Arthritis, Statin Indication and Lipid Goals: Analysis According to Different Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Different strategies have been proposed for the cardiovascular risk management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVES: (1) To estimate the cardiovascular risk by different strategies in RA patients, analyzing which proportion of patients would be candidates to receive statin therapy; (2) to identify how many patients meet the recommended lipid goals. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed from a secondary database. The QRISK-3 score, the Framingham score (adjusted for a multiplying factor×1.5), the ASCVD calculator and the SCORE calculator were estimated. The indications for statin therapy according to NICE, Argentine Consensus, ACC/AHA, and new European guidelines were analyzed. The recommended LDL-C goals were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients were included. In total, 24.7% and 48.7% of patients in primary and secondary prevention were receiving statins, respectively. Only 19.4% of patients with cardiovascular history received high intensity statins. Applying the ACC/AHA guidelines (based on ASCVD score), the Argentine Consensuses (based on adjusted Framingham score), the NICE guidelines (based on QRISK-3) and European recommendations (based on SCORE), 26.9%, 26.5%, 41.1% and 18.2% of the population were eligible for statin therapy, respectively. Following the new European recommendations, 50.0%, 46.2% and 15.9% of the patients with low-moderate, high or very high risk achieved the suggested lipid goals. CONCLUSION: Applying four strategies for lipid management in our population, the cardiovascular risk stratification and the indication for statins were different. A significant gap was observed when comparing the expected and observed statin indication, with few patients achieving the LDL-C goals.

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Statin Indication and Lipid Goals: Analysis According to Different Recommendations / Artritis reumatoide, indicación de estatinas y objetivos lipídicos: Análisis según diferentes recomendaciones

Background: Different strategies have been proposed for the cardiovascular risk management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Objectives(1) To estimate the cardiovascular risk by different strategies in RA patients, analyzing which proportion of patients would be candidates to receive statin therapy; (2) to identify how many patients meet the recommended lipid goals. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed from a secondary database. The QRISK-3 score, the Framingham score (adjusted for a multiplying factor×1.5), the ASCVD calculator and the SCORE calculator were estimated. The indications for statin therapy according to NICE, Argentine Consensus, ACC/AHA, and new European guidelines were analyzed. The recommended LDL-C goals were analyzed. Results: A total of 420 patients were included. In total, 24.7% and 48.7% of patients in primary and secondary prevention were receiving statins, respectively. Only 19.4% of patients with cardiovascular history received high intensity statins. Applying the ACC/AHA guidelines (based on ASCVD score), the Argentine Consensuses (based on adjusted Framingham score), the NICE guidelines (based on QRISK-3) and European recommendations (based on SCORE), 26.9%, 26.5%, 41.1% and 18.2% of the population were eligible for statin therapy, respectively. Following the new European recommendations, 50.0%, 46.2% and 15.9% of the patients with low-moderate, high or very high risk achieved the suggested lipid goals. Conclusion: Applying four strategies for lipid management in our population, the cardiovascular risk stratification and the indication for statins were different. A significant gap was observed when comparing the expected and observed statin indication, with few patients achieving the LDL-C goals.(AU)

Antecedentes: Se han propuesto diferentes estrategias para el manejo del riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR).Objetivos(1) estimar el riesgo cardiovascular mediante diferentes estrategias en pacientes con AR, analizando qué proporción de pacientes deberían recibir estatinas; (2) identificar cuántos pacientes alcanzaron los objetivos lipídicos recomendados. Métodos: Estudio de corte transversal. Se estimaron los puntajes QRISK-3, Framingham (ajustado por un factor multiplicador × 1,5), ASCVD y SCORE. Se analizaron las indicaciones de estatinas, según las guías NICE, el Consenso Argentino, las guías ACC/AHA 2018 y las nuevas directrices europeas. Se analizaron los objetivos de C-LDL. Resultados: Se incluyeron 420 pacientes; 24,7 y 48,7% de los pacientes en prevención primaria y secundaria recibían estatinas, respectivamente. El 19,4% de los pacientes con antecedentes cardiovasculares recibían estatinas de alta intensidad. Aplicando las guías ACC/AHA (basadas en el puntaje ASCVD), el Consenso Argentino (basado en el puntaje ajustado de Framingham), las pautas NICE (basadas en el QRISK-3) y las recomendaciones europeas (basadas en el SCORE), 26,9, 26,5, 41,1 y el 18,2% de la población eran elegibles para el tratamiento con estatinas, respectivamente. Siguiendo las nuevas recomendaciones europeas, 50, 46,2 y 15,9% de los pacientes con riesgo bajo-moderado, alto o muy alto lograron los objetivos lipídicos recomendados. Conclusión: Aplicando varias estrategias para el manejo de los lípidos en nuestra población, la estratificación del riesgo cardiovascular y la indicación de estatinas fueron diferentes. Se observó una brecha significativa entre la indicación de estatinas esperada y observada, logrando los objetivos de C-LDL muy pocos pacientes.(AU)

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Statin Indication and Lipid Goals: Analysis According to Different Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Different strategies have been proposed for the cardiovascular risk management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVES: (1) To estimate the cardiovascular risk by different strategies in RA patients, analyzing which proportion of patients would be candidates to receive statin therapy; (2) to identify how many patients meet the recommended lipid goals. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed from a secondary database. The QRISK-3 score, the Framingham score (adjusted for a multiplying factor×1.5), the ASCVD calculator and the SCORE calculator were estimated. The indications for statin therapy according to NICE, Argentine Consensus, ACC/AHA, and new European guidelines were analyzed. The recommended LDL-C goals were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients were included. In total, 24.7% and 48.7% of patients in primary and secondary prevention were receiving statins, respectively. Only 19.4% of patients with cardiovascular history received high intensity statins. Applying the ACC/AHA guidelines (based on ASCVD score), the Argentine Consensuses (based on adjusted Framingham score), the NICE guidelines (based on QRISK-3) and European recommendations (based on SCORE), 26.9%, 26.5%, 41.1% and 18.2% of the population were eligible for statin therapy, respectively. Following the new European recommendations, 50.0%, 46.2% and 15.9% of the patients with low-moderate, high or very high risk achieved the suggested lipid goals. CONCLUSION: Applying four strategies for lipid management in our population, the cardiovascular risk stratification and the indication for statins were different. A significant gap was observed when comparing the expected and observed statin indication, with few patients achieving the LDL-C goals.

Cardiovascular risk stratification and appropriate use of statins in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus according to different strategies.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular risk management of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is medically relevant. The objectives were to estimate the cardiovascular risk by different strategies in patients with SLE, analyzing which proportion of patients would be candidates to receive statin therapy, and identify how many patients with statin indication received such drugs. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was performed from a secondary database. Following the recommendations of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines and the Argentine Consensus, the QRISK-3 and the adjusted Framingham (multiplying factor × 2) scores were calculated in primary prevention subjects. The indications for statin therapy according to these recommendations were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 110 patients were included. Regarding patients without previous cardiovascular history, the median adjusted Framingham score was 12.8% (4.1-21.9), and 45.2%, 22.6%, and 32.2% of them were classified at low, moderate, or high risk. The median QRISK-3 score was 6.0% (2.1-14.1) and 42.1% of subjects were classified "at risk". Only 60% of subjects in secondary prevention received statins, although no patient received the recommended doses. Analyzing patients in primary prevention who did not receive statins (87%), 43.4% and 45.2% of the patients were eligible for statin therapy according to NICE guidelines and Argentine Consensus, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that a large proportion of patients with SLE have a considerable cardiovascular risk and many of them would be eligible for statin therapy. However, the statin use observed was low.Key Points• A large proportion of patients with lupus have a considerable cardiovascular risk, explained in part by dyslipidemia.• Many patients with SLE would be eligible for statin therapy according to risk stratification based on conventional risk factors.• The use of statins in this population is inadequate.